Scott Ellis is up on the front page of the website this morning, explaining how he uses locator calls instead of hen calls to get gobblers to sound off as he's moving in to set up on them. It got me to thinking.
I hardly ever use a locator call any more. Oh, I did. I used to owl and crow and use a hawk whistle when I first moved out to the farm. In fact I did it a lot. Then I started to listen. My gobblers might take a bit longer than I wanted to sound off, but usually they did. They had enough coaxing from the rest of the world; they did not need me.
I'm in a rural area-- a bunch of fallow farms, and a lot of woods in between. In some directions, I do not have a neighbor for over a mile. Still there are enough noises early in the morning to usually keep the gobblers going. A car door slams over on the next ridge, a school bus changes gear out on the country road, a rooster crows. For a number of years a neighbor's donkey used to keep the gobblers going all morning. Then it was another neighbor's guinea fowl. Of course there were always plenty of crows and hawks to fill in any big gaps. Little by little, I reduced the number of times I went to the locator, and then I have pretty much given up entirely.
Scott's video got me thinking more: When I get a gobbler to answer a locator call, what does that really tell me? Yes, I've goaded him into answering. However, how hot was he before I called? On the other hand, if I wait a little while and let something in the natural sound environment set him off, I can slide in on him without causing any fuss, and I have a much better idea of how hot he is. It may have taken him a car door, two crows and school bus to get him to sound off or it may have been just one noisy squirrel.
The thing of it is, I don't know if this conservative strategy really buys me anything. I think it does. I think it gives me a bit more stealth, and a bit more info on my opponent. However, I'm open to conversation on it. What do y'all think?


Follow Us